Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 2023 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286704

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize evidence for (1) the effectiveness of exercise-based rehabilitation interventions in the community and/or at home after transfemoral and transtibial amputation on pain, physical function, and quality of life and (2) the extent of inequities (unfair, avoidable differences in health) in access to identified interventions. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE, PEDro, Cinahl, Global Health, PsycINFO, OpenGrey, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to August 12, 2021, for published, unpublished, and registered ongoing randomized controlled trials. STUDY SELECTION: Three review authors completed screening and quality appraisal in Covidence using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Included were randomized controlled trials of exercise-based rehabilitation interventions based in the community or at home for adults with transfemoral or transtibial amputation that assessed effectiveness on pain, physical function, or quality of life. DATA EXTRACTION: Effectiveness data were extracted to templates defined a priori and the PROGRESS-Plus framework was used for equity factors. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eight completed trials of low to moderate quality, 2 trial protocols, and 3 registered ongoing trials (351 participants across trials) were identified. Interventions included cognitive behavioral therapy, education, and video games, combined with exercise. There was heterogeneity in the mode of exercise as well as outcome measures employed. Intervention effects on pain, physical function, and quality of life were inconsistent. Intervention intensity, time of delivery, and degree of supervision influenced reported effectiveness. Overall, 423 potential participants were inequitably excluded from identified trials (65%), limiting the generalizability of interventions to the underlying population. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that were tailored, supervised, of higher intensity, and not in the immediate postacute phase showed greater promise for improving specific physical function outcomes. Future trials should explore these effects further and employ more inclusive eligibility to optimize any future implementation.

2.
BMJ ; 374: n1883, 2021 07 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1495212
3.
Annu Rev Biomed Eng ; 23: 461-491, 2021 07 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1191179

ABSTRACT

Modeling immunity in vitro has the potential to be a powerful tool for investigating fundamental biological questions, informing therapeutics and vaccines, and providing new insight into disease progression. There are two major elements to immunity that are necessary to model: primary immune tissues and peripheral tissues with immune components. Here, we systematically review progress made along three strategies to modeling immunity: ex vivo cultures, which preserve native tissue structure; microfluidic devices, which constitute a versatile approach to providing physiologically relevant fluid flow and environmental control; and engineered tissues, which provide precise control of the 3D microenvironment and biophysical cues. While many models focus on disease modeling, more primary immune tissue models are necessary to advance the field. Moving forward, we anticipate that the expansion of patient-specific models may inform why immunity varies from patient to patient and allow for the rapid comprehension and treatment of emerging diseases, such as coronavirus disease 2019.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , Tissue Engineering/methods , Adaptive Immunity , Animals , Biophysics , Humans , Immune System , Immunity, Innate , In Vitro Techniques , Lab-On-A-Chip Devices , Lymphocytes/immunology , Macrophages/immunology , Mice , Microfluidics , SARS-CoV-2 , Thymus Gland/immunology , Tissue Array Analysis
4.
BMJ : British Medical Journal (Online) ; 371, 2020.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1020989

ABSTRACT

A group of media doctors share how it has felt to lead these conversations during the pandemic.2 Role models are important in tough times. An observational study from Sweden finds that the proportion of doctors with a physician parent has risen in recent decades, a trend that was not observed in a control group of lawyers.4 Audiobooks, exercise, video calls, family time, and supportive teams and colleagues are all rescue remedies and inspirations that have helped doctors and patients through a turbulent year.5 Communities have also pulled together. Elliot Hall Medical Centre in Harrow, where staff mobilised patients to support vulnerable people in their community, highlights the power of patient partnership and shows that change for the better is possible even in the hardest of circumstances.6 With community in mind, please support our chosen charity this Christmas: the Independent Food Aid Network.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL